Why Medical and Refractive Insurance Carriers Are Increasing Provider Audits – and How to Protect Yourself

Insurance audits for optometrists are on the rise, driven by cost containment efforts, AI-powered claim reviews, and stricter payer policies. Eye care providers are under increasing pressure to deliver precise medical necessity documentation, code accurately, and use compliant diagnostic tools – especially for procedures like visual field testing. Practices that fall short risk denials, recoupments, and administrative strain. Virtual Field helps reduce insurance audit risk by offering a validated, FDA-registered solution with built-in optometry compliance features like timestamped cloud storage, DICOM compatibility, and electronic health record (EHR) integration. 

This article explains why audits are increasing, what triggers them, and how tools like Virtual Field support defensible, audit-proof visual field exam protocols.

‍

Why Provider Audits Are On the Rise

In recent years, optometrists and ophthalmologists have experienced a significant increase in the frequency and intensity of insurance audits from medical insurance carriers and vision plan providers. This trend spans across payers, including Medicare, which has expanded its audit efforts through Recovery Audit Contractors (RACs) and other oversight programs. The heightened scrutiny applies not only to claims related to medical conditions, such as glaucoma and neurological disorders, but also to routine services billed under refractive or vision benefit plans.

A major driver behind the surge in audits is the post-pandemic need for cost containment. As insurers work to recoup losses and manage rising healthcare expenditures, they are increasingly monitoring provider billing patterns more aggressively. Advances in artificial intelligence (AI) and data analytics have accelerated this process. Many payers now use AI-based tools to flag potential anomalies in claim submissions, such as patterns that deviate from normative utilization rates or appear inconsistent with standard coding practices.

These flagged claims often trigger prepayment or retrospective audits, placing additional administrative burdens on eye care practices and increasing the risk of payment recoupment or credentialing actions. Even well-intentioned providers can become audit targets if medical necessity documentation fails to meet payer requirements or if billing practices fall out of alignment with evolving policy guidelines.

The trend is not expected to slow down. Insurers continue to refine their auditing capabilities, focusing on both fraud prevention and optometry compliance enforcement. Eye care professionals should be prepared to adapt to this environment by understanding audit triggers, maintaining thorough documentation of visual field testing, and aligning clinical protocols with payer expectations.

‍

Common Triggers for Provider Audits

Medical and refractive insurance carriers are placing increased scrutiny on provider billing practices, often initiating audits based on identifiable patterns. Some of the most common triggers include a high volume of high-reimbursement CPT codes, repetitive testing without documented justification, inconsistent or missing clinical documentation, and outdated or non-compliant diagnostic equipment. 

• High Volume of High-Reimbursement CPT Codes: One of the most common audit triggers is a consistently high volume of high-reimbursement CPT codes, such as those for visual field testing, optical coherence tomography (OCT), and refractions. While these procedures are essential in many cases, frequent billing without clear documentation of medical necessity may raise red flags.
• Repetitive Testing Without Documented Justification: Repetitive diagnostic testing – especially when performed at short intervals or during routine exams – can also draw attention, particularly if the medical record lacks documentation that supports medical necessity. Payers are increasingly focused on ensuring that each test performed is both appropriate and clinically validated for visual field testing.
• Inconsistent or Missing Clinical Documentation: Another common trigger is the presence of inconsistent, incomplete, or missing documentation for visual field testing. Auditors often look for detailed chart notes that clearly explain why a service was rendered, what findings were observed, and how the results impacted the patient’s diagnosis or treatment plan. A lack of such documentation can be interpreted as non-compliance, even when the services were legitimate.
• Outdated or Non-Compliant Diagnostic Equipment: Using outdated or non-compliant diagnostic equipment can signal quality-of-care concerns and prompt further review. Insurance carriers may question the reliability of diagnostic results from obsolete devices, especially if newer technology is considered the standard of care.

By understanding these common triggers, eye care professionals can proactively review their coding, documentation, and equipment practices to reduce insurance audit risk. Maintaining accurate records and ensuring that all services are supported by medical necessity documentation are crucial steps in preventing audits.

‍

Protecting Your Practice Starts with Smart Testing Protocols

One of the most effective ways to safeguard your eye care practice from visual field insurance audit risk is to implement rigorous, compliant testing protocols using clinically validated tools. Devices that offer built-in visual field testing documentation, standardized workflows, and cloud-based data access not only improve clinical efficiency but also enhance your audit preparedness.

For example, Virtual Field is FDA-registered and MDSAP-certified, distinguishing it as a reliable and trusted visual field testing device. These credentials demonstrate adherence to rigorous international quality and safety standards, which can be critical during insurance audits for optometrists.

Using a platform like Virtual Field supports optometry compliance by generating detailed, time-stamped reports that are automatically stored in the cloud. This documentation is easy to access and share when responding to audit requests, minimizing administrative burden and reducing the risk of missing or incomplete records.

Smart testing tools also support appropriate coding and medical necessity documentation. Virtual visual field devices typically offer more flexibility in test administration and integrate prompts or workflows that help ensure proper clinical justification. This makes it easier for providers to select the correct CPT codes and align testing protocols with payer policies.

Increased audit activity from medical and refractive insurance carriers means providers must be proactive about compliance. By standardizing visual field testing with clinically validated, audit-proof visual field exam tools, practices can ensure they are delivering medically necessary care while maintaining the visual field testing documentation required to support it. This reduces insurance audit risk and supports long-term operational stability.

‍

Documentation Tips for Visual Field Exams

Here are five documentation tips to help keep your visual field exams compliant:

1. Clearly state the medical necessity. Always clearly state the clinical indication for the visual field test, such as glaucoma suspect status, visual symptoms related to neurological concerns, ptosis, or headache. This justification must be reflected in both the patient’s chart and the associated claim.
2. Use appropriate ICD-10 codes. Ensure diagnosis codes align with the patient’s symptoms and test findings. Inaccurate or unsupported codes, like using “glaucoma suspect” without clinical evidence, can trigger insurance audits for optometrists.
3. Securely store test results. Ensure all test results are stored in a secure, retrievable, and timestamped format. EHR integration for eye care and adherence to DICOM standards can streamline access and preserve data integrity.
4. Include interpretation and reliability indices. Documentation should note the provider’s interpretation, reliability indices, and a comparison to previous tests when applicable.
5. Establish a consistent protocol. A standardized process for documenting and storing visual field tests helps ensure optometry compliance, supports clinical decisions, and protects the practice during insurance audits.

Incomplete documentation or lack of justification for testing may result in denials or post-payment recoupment. Establish a standardized process to protect your practice from visual field audit risk.

‍

Final Thoughts

At at time when it feels like profit margins are becoming razor thin, every protective measure you can put into place to protect your revenue potential means greater opportunities to build a sustain a practice that offers patients the best possible care and outcomes. Today’s practice administrators and their doctors must be more vigilant than ever in safeguarding their practices against insurance audits. By understanding the factors that trigger audits and implementing smart, compliant protocols for visual field testing, providers can significantly reduce their audit exposure. 

For more information about Virtual Field and its ROI potential, download our white paper, The Financial Impact of Upgrading to Virtual Visual Field Testing:  A Cost-Benefit Analysis.